Re: Problem with ext4_sync_file in no-journal mode.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:41 AM, Frank Mayhar<fmayhar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> That's what you would think, isn't it?  However, you (and we) would be
> wrong.  In our testing, ext4+fsync was significantly worse than ext4
> without fsync.  Like, six times worse.  Yes, this is a nonintuitive
> result and no, I can't yet explain it.

Frank is referring to (ext4 with no_journal)+fsync compared to ext4
with no journal and no fsync.

With the journal everything is working as reliably as expected.

We will be publishing data for all the permutations of crashes and
power cycles we have tested as soon as we are confident in all the
data.

mrubin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux