Re: [PATCH V2] reject too-large filesystems on 32-bit kernels

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 05:30:23PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> ext4 will happily mount a > 16T filesystem on a 32-bit box, but
> this is not safe; writes to the block device will wrap past 16T
> and the page cache can't index past 16T (232 index * 4k pages).

Applied in the ext4 patch queue, with minor changes to take into
account the use of ext4_msg().

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux