Re: [PATCH] xfstests: 220 - generic quota sanity

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Lachlan McIlroy wrote:
> This looks good Eric.
> 
> Is this test just for quota accounting or should it be testing quota
> enforcement too?

I guess 108 just did accounting; I was going to keep it parallel, and do
a different one for accounting, but it could be added to this as well.

-Eric

> Lachlan
> 
> ----- "Eric Sandeen" <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Add some very basic quota sanity tests for generic filesystems.
>>
>> This is based on test 108, but uses the generic quota tools,
>> not xfs_quota, and therefore cannot test project quota.
>>
>> Also, the IOs are much smaller (48k) so that ext3 won't get into
>> indirect blocks and throw off the accounting.  This does
>> assume 4k blocks though.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---

...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux