Questions about mballoc's stream allocation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I've got two questions about mballoc's stream allocation.

First of all, in ext4_mb_regular_allocator(), I'm 99% sure this is a
bug:

	/* if stream allocation is enabled, use global goal */
	size = ac->ac_o_ex.fe_logical + ac->ac_o_ex.fe_len;
	isize = i_size_read(ac->ac_inode) >> bsbits;
	if (size < isize)
		size = isize;

	if (size < sbi->s_mb_stream_request &&
	    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
			(ac->ac_flags & EXT4_MB_HINT_DATA)) {
		/* TBD: may be hot point */
		spin_lock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
		ac->ac_g_ex.fe_group = sbi->s_mb_last_group;
		ac->ac_g_ex.fe_start = sbi->s_mb_last_start;
		spin_unlock(&sbi->s_md_lock);
	}

Shouldn't that be ">=", not "<".  We want to use the values saved in
sbi->s_mb_last_{group,start} only if we are doing a stream allocation,
which would be true only if the file is *larger* than
s_mb_stream_request, no?


The second question I have is with regards to ext4_mb_use_best_found(),
we set sbi->s_mb_last_{group,start} on any data allocation; shouldn't we
only be setting those values only if we were doing a stream allocation
in the first place?

Otherwise, any kind of allocation will end up moving the global goal
block for stream allocations; even if it is a small allocation in the
middle of some block group caused by the flag EXT4_MB_HINT_NO_PREALLOC
being set.

Am I missing anything?

     	   	      	       		     - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux