On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 04:41:22PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:28:11PM -0400, Valerie Aurora wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2009 at 10:22:09PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > > > In case people are wondering why it's taking so long to merge the > > > 64-bit patch series, let me show one patch as exhibit 'A' about how > > > not to submit patches to me (or Linus, or any other upstream > > > maintainer): > > > > Oh, geez, those are an old patch set! I did go back and fix the > > temporary commits and dangly semi-colons, plus reimplemented progress > > meters the way you wanted: > > > > http://osdir.com/ml/linux-ext4/2009-02/msg00591.html > > Oh, I see what happened. It looks like you fixed some of that up in > the "shared-64bit-handover" branch, but I didn't see that one, since > you checked in the bug fixes and patches which Nick Dokus submitted > into the "shared-64bit" branch. Hence, the shared-64bit branch had > commits in it dating from May, 2009, while the shared-64bit-handover > branch had commits dating from February, 2009. Hence, I started work > using the shared-64bit branch instead of the shared-64bit-handover > branch. Yeah, it's pretty hard to keep track of which branch does what after several months go by. Maybe next time we can sync up first if it's been a while since the last review/pull request. -VAL -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
