Mark Lord wrote: > Eric Sandeen wrote: >> Mark Lord wrote: >>> (resending, no ack from anyone first time around). >> I had previously sent a fix for this to the ext4 list as well, although >> w/o the added case for compat_ioctl or the extra #include. >> >> Because this ioctl should be 100% compat everywhere, I don't -think- >> it's needed, and >> >> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=124872536713005&w=2 >> >> suffices.... > .. > > Well, whichever of the two works best for the maintainers. > > We need *something* for it upstream, and probably back in -stable too. > Otherwise this prevents using 64-bit kernels on 32-bit userland, > as Linus likes to recommend so often. ;) > > Cheers > Heh, it's probably far from the only ioctl missing a compat handler, but yeah. :) -Eric -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
