Re: Question on fallocate/ftruncate sequence (and flags)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 15:54 -0600, Andreas Dilger wrote:
> That said, we might need to have some kind of flag in the on-disk
> inode to indicate that it was preallocated beyond EOF.  Otherwise,
> e2fsck will try and extend the file size to match the block count,
> which isn't correct.  We could also use this flag to determine if
> truncate needs to be run on the inode even if the new size is the
> same.

As it happens there's already a flag, FS_FALLOC_FL, set by ext2 in
fallocate().  Unfortunately ext4 is using that bit (0x00040000) for
EXT4_HUGE_FILE_FL.  (Ext4 is using another bit as well, 0x00100000, for
EXT4_EXT_MIGRATE_FL when fs.h defines it as FS_DIRECTIO_FL.)  I really
want to use the FS_FALLOC_FL bit for this purpose but that means
reallocating HUGE_FILE_FL to some other big.  Objections?
-- 
Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Google, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux