Re: ext4 memory leak (was Re: [PATCH] x86: _edata should include all .data.* sections on X86_64)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ingo Molnar schrieb:
* Alexey Fisher <bug-track@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

This patch work for me.

nice. Any leftovers that might be false positives and need annotation?

We learned this with lockdep: the moment a typical x86 distro bootup is 'warnings free', utility of the debugging facility increases dramatically: people can standardize on 'kmemleak should never produce warnings' workflows and distros can also start feeding kmemleak reports into kerneloops.org or so.

So the general direction kmemleak is moving into is really encouraging.

	Ingo

suddenly my kernel is not warning free... i have still warning about acpi_init, cpufreg, intel_gem and inoitfy on my PC and about firmware loader on my laptop. So i think there is still some job to do. I will report this warnings soon.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux