On Fri, 2009-07-17 at 10:36 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 07:46:13PM +0100, Scott James Remnant wrote: > > Since util-linux-ng now builds libblkid by default, e2fsprogs > > should not do so. > > I'm not going to be applying these patches for quite some time. I'd > much rather have packaging scripts that *know* they will be packaging > alongside util-linux-ng use --disable-libblkid, etc. so we don't break > things for folks who might need to build e2fsprogs for distributions > that are still using util-linux --- which at the moment still have the > vast majority of the installed base, and every so often people do > actually care about running updated filesystem utilities on an older > enterprise distribution. > But you didn't accept those patches I sent either. > The at the minimum I'll want to make sure that the debian/rules file > packaged with e2fsprogs can build both for util-linux and > util-linux-ng for similar reasons, especially since Lamont hasn't > gotten back to us about potentially getting util-linux-ng packaged for > Debian yet. > I've done the packaging for him, it's just waiting on him to get back home to sponsor the uploads. Scott -- Scott James Remnant scott@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
