Re: A tree to pull into linux-next

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 04:48:26PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > I am happy to include this, but (no offense) I would like to hear from
> > the ext3 and jbd maintainers (cc'd) about it.
> > 
> 
> The main isssue would be that akpm often has ext3 changes stashed in
> -mm.  Having a separate ext3 tree makes sense, and if Jan wants to
> maintain it, that makes good sense to me, but we should get Andrew's
> sign off, and Jan should make sure he has any ext3/jbd patches that
> might be in -mm, to avoid any potential patch conflicts.
  Yeah. It's upto Andrew. I think he pulls linux-next so he should notice
conflicts. Anyway, I don't mind pushing the changes through him if he
likes it more that way but I've felt that he's rather busy and this
hopefully helps him a bit...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SuSE CR Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux