On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 03:15, Mike Frysinger<vapier@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wednesday 01 July 2009 20:58:58 Theodore Tso wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 06:35:06PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> > > In older udev releases, before we switched to automake, I had >> > > something like this, which behaves a bit like the Linux kernel build, >> > > and V=1 switches off the silent mode: >> > >> > why not just use automake-1.11's silent-rules option. then you dont have >> > to waste time reinventing the wheel. >> >> Because I consider automake the spawn of Satan? :-) Yeah, it is. It's strange what these tools produce. But it sees it's slowly getting better over time not worse - so there is hope. Even the recent libtool looks ok now. And I don't really miss the check for FORTRAN, which seems to have disappeared here recently. :) > i'll have you know Satan's wheel is awfully shiny ... Heh, yeah. If you do not check-in the created stuff into git, and use: git clean -d -X -f autoreconf --install --symlink to bootstrap a repo, stuff looks pretty good, I think. You just need to be able to convince yourself not to look into the generated files. :) On the other hand the silent rules and "make distcheck" and all these things which come along with automake are just great to have. > Kay's rules look like they should be fairly straightforward to drop into > e2fsprogs. personally i'd use: > E = @: > when V=1, but this is probably just splitting hairs Ah nice, looks good to me, if that works. Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
