On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 03:14:20PM -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2009 at 10:13:57PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > I think i both the case Jan's patch > > allocate-blocks-correctly-with-subpage-blocksize need an update ? Since you have put > > the patch before Jan's changes. > > OK, here's how I updated Jan's patch. I'm going to assume that we'll > submit the ext4 patch queue immediately as soon as the merge window > opens, since my impression is Jan is still waiting for some mm > developers to review his patch set. > > Annesh, does this look good to you? I just did a quick look. Should we do a block_unlock_hole_extend after journal_stop. We do a block_lock_hole_extend before journal_start. > > Jan, if we go down this path, you'll need to update your ext4 patch > with this updated one, to take into account the changes from Aneesh's > patch. > > (We could do it the other way, but that means even more patches queued > up behind Jan's patch series, and I didn't realize originally that > Aneesh intended for these to be queued after Jan's patches. So it > seemed easier to just order Aneesh's patches to avoid block allocation > leaks first, since they are at least functionally (if not > syntactically) independent of the subpagesize blocksize patches.) -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
