On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 04:59:11PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> Yes, that would be fine. Thanks. Luckily, the dependence is just one way
> (ext4 change has to go after the VFS patch) so it's just enough to merge
> that ext4 change some time after VFS changes go in.
ext4: Add WARN_ON on unmapped dirty buffer_heads in writepage
fs: Don't clear dirty bits in block_write_full_page()
vfs: Unmap underlying metadata of new data buffers only when buffer is m
ext4: Make sure blocks are properly allocated under mmaped page even whe
vfs: Add better VFS support for page_mkwrite when blocksize < pagesize
FYI, I've added the following to the unstable portion of the patch
queue, and have started running tests (fsx, fsstress, and dbench)
using 1k blocksizes, using a variety of ext4 mount options. So far,
things look good.
How goes the reviews/comments? Are we planning on pushing this to
Linus at the beginning of the next merge window?
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
