http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369 --- Comment #11 from Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 2009-05-24 18:28:23 --- On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 02:52:48AM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13369 > > > Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |tytso@xxxxxxx > > > > > --- Comment #5 from Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> 2009-05-24 02:52:48 --- > So I'm glad you're using a filesystem with a 1k blocksize since it provides a > good test case for us --- and we don't do enough testing for the case where the > blocksize != pagesize. But you do realize that the ext4 filesystem will be > far more efficient with the larger 4k blocksize, right? > > I'm not able to reproduce the problem on a filesystem with 1k blocksize running > fsx, fsstress, and dbench using a 2.6.30-rc6 kernel with the full ext4 patch > queue, using a netbook with an dual-core N270 Atom processor. I'm retrying > with a stock 2.6.30-rc6 kernel now... > It is with nodelalloc. I am also finding some unmapped buffer_heads in nodelalloc mode with data=journal. See the latest update for bug http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12624 -aneesh -- Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching the assignee of the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
