On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:57:05AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > For F11 I will likely put in the later 2 patches, to fix up the minimum > size reporting and then enforce that as the minimum size, so we > shouldn't(tm) get into these error paths. Seems like the safer > last-minute change. The first half of this patch I think is quite safe, and after stepping through tst_etent, I'm pretty sure the second half of this patch would be pretty easy to validate. We probably don't want to enter any of these error paths for now, though, since it's not clear we've fied all of them, particularly in the split_node code. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
