Re: [PATCH 1/2 for 2.6.31] ext4: Use -1 as the fake block number for delayed new buffer_head

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 for 2.6.31] ext4: Use -1 as the fake block number for delayed new buffer_head
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 14:58:41 -0400
Cc: cmm@xxxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-ext4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1241003611-3652-1-git-send-email-aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

You mean "for 2.6.30", right?

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 1/2 for 2.6.31] ext4: Use -1 as the fake block number for delayed new buffer_head
  - From: Aneesh Kumar K.V

References:
- [PATCH 1/2 for 2.6.31] ext4: Use -1 as the fake block number for delayed new buffer_head
  - From: Aneesh Kumar K.V

Prev by Date: [PATCH v2] ext4: Use separate super_operations structure for no_journal filesystems
Next by Date: [PATCH 3/4] ext4: Move fs/ext4/namei.h into ext4.h
Previous by thread: [PATCH 2/2 for 2.6.31] ext4: Mark the unwritten buffer_head mapped during write_begin
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 1/2 for 2.6.31] ext4: Use -1 as the fake block number for delayed new buffer_head
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Reiser Filesystem Development] [Ceph FS] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Linux FS] [Yosemite National Park] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Samba] [Device Mapper] [Linux Media]

Powered by Linux