Re: [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Use separate super_operations structure for no_journal filesystems

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On May 01, 2009  00:37 -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> @@ -3923,6 +3911,12 @@ static int __init init_ext4_fs(void)
> +	ext4_nojournal_sops = ext4_sops;
> +	ext4_nojournal_sops.write_super = ext4_write_super;
> +	ext4_nojournal_sops.sync_fs = 0;
> +	ext4_nojournal_sops.freeze_fs = 0;
> +	ext4_nojournal_sops.unfreeze_fs = 0;

I thought the general policy these days was to make a static const
ops struct so that it cannot be changed (correctly or incorrectly)?

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux