Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 02:40:58AM -0700, Christian Kujau wrote:
>> Maybe the repair with 1.41.{3,4} before did something wrong and I should
>> use 1.41.5 from the beginning? This issue is somewhat reproducible (given
>> the fs holds enough files), so I could start over, corrupt the fs again
>> and let e2fsprogs-1.41.5 do the whole job.
>
> I doubt it; the problem was that the repair performed by e2fsck 1.41.3
> was simply imcomplete. You can try to reproduce the corrupted
> filesystem again, but it should result in the same result.
>
> Note that because there was garbage written into the inode table,
> there was going to be data loss; there's not much that can be done
> about that. This just simple does a better job cleaning up after the
> mess, that's all.
>
> - Ted
>
But it's still got errors:
it fixed up inodes 12042, 12207, 12249 in lost+found plus "12090
(/t/#12090)" (?)
but post-mount:
sid:~# mount -t ext4 /dev/md0 /mnt/md0
sid:~# ls -la /mnt/md0/lost*
ls: cannot access /mnt/md0/lost+found/#12042: Input/output error
ls: cannot access /mnt/md0/lost+found/#12207: Input/output error
ls: cannot access /mnt/md0/lost+found/#12249: Input/output error
total 20
c????????? ? ? ? ? ? #12042
s????????? ? ? ? ? ? #12207
s????????? ? ? ? ? ? #12249
drwx------ 2 root root 16384 Apr 23 21:16 .
drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 4096 Apr 23 21:15 ..
Christian, is there anything in dmesg along with it this time?
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
