Re: [PATCH] ext4: Make the extent validity check more paranoid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:04:30PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>> Instead of just checking that the extent block number is greater or
>>> equal than s_first_data_block, make sure it it is not pointing into
>>> the block group descriptors, since that is clearly wrong.  This helps
>>> prevent filesystem from getting very badly corrupted in case an extent
>>> block is corrupted.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
>> Good idea.  Maybe we can get our friends with the corrupted fs to run
>> with these validation patches... I can get this into rawhide at least.
> 
> Yeah, unfortunately this patch requires some other patches that went
> in during the 2.6.30 merge window, so some extra back-porting would be
> needed for our friends running a 2.6.29.1 Fedora kernel.

Right, but rawhide has .30-etc, so a test on that might be helpful.

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux