Great to hear from you, Ted! On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 09:33 -0400, Theodore Tso wrote: > Also, I have not dropped in the debian packaging changes which you > made Scott, since you just conditionally made changes to the > debian/rules and debian/config file, which means e2fsprogs would break > on Debian (which hasn't even packaged util-linux-ng yet) and on > versions of Ubuntu that haven't made the switch yet. > Yeah, that seems fair. I actually left both versions of the code in the rules with the in-tree blkid stuff commented out assuming we'd ifeq around them as we do with util-linux-ng. The package went into a PPA not the archive, so it was in a "just get it done and worry about making it look good later" state. Obviously this doesn't solve the debian/control problem - that would require generating it with/without the libblkid parts depending on target distro. > P.S. Scott, if you haven't been tracking linux-ext4, there are some > rather critical resize2fs bugfixes that recently came into the tree, > which fix bugs that cause filesystem corruption when growing or > shrinking ext4 filesystems off-line. > Grabbed that, thanks! We're absolutely final frozen for Jaunty now; the CDs were spun on Monday, but the problem has been noted in our Release Notes. Since the patches are reasonably small and uninvasive, we'll look into them for a jaunty-updates upload. Scott -- Scott James Remnant scott@xxxxxxxxxx
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
