Re: e2fsck -y says "yes" to "Abort?"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Eric Sandeen wrote:
Ric Wheeler wrote:

The only down side is when you try to automate this (say in an appliance) and you don't have a human reading the output. In this case, you might just want to invert the logic but in general, it does seem dangerous to invert the logic for a long standing option,

Ric


Maybe make something like "-yy" automatically answer "n" to anything
that would stop the fsck, and answer "y" to anything that it proposes
fixing?

-Eric
That would be useful for scripting users - it is already assumed to be wildly dangerous to run it in "yes" mode I would assume in any case :-)

ric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux