On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 13:39 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 13:22 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > Greetings, > > > This passed a longer stress test and generally seems to be working. I > > don't think anyone would recommend it as a default for 2.6.30, but it > > may be a good idea to have a review party and decide if it is safe enough > > to include so people can experiment with it. > > I know you didn't say RFT, but I did some anyway, and found a 100% > repeatable corruption scenario wrt git+umount. > Well, that's a surprise. I can trigger it here too, trying to figure out how this is different from the fsx and fsstress hammering. It looks like git is just going good old fashioned writes, so I must be losing one or two of them. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
