Re: [PATCH 0/5][64-BIT] Miscellaneous e2fsprogs 64-bit patches - description

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 05:45:47PM -0400, Nick Dokos wrote:
> [I submitted the first three of these last week, but the first one,
> although the fix was correct (in the sense of fiddling with the correct
> bits), stylistically and from the point of code conventions and
> readability, was rather a botch.  #2 and #3 are identical as patches but
> I fixed up parts of the commentary that were wrong or misleading. So I
> am reposting these as well as a couple of new ones. Please let me know
> if there are other problems of this sort. Thanks!]

Hi Nick,

Thanks for the testing and patches!  I apologize for the delay in
replying; if it's any consolation, we were all at the Linux file
systems workshop when you sent this email.

All the patches look good to me (and I will ACK them individually).  I
pulled them into my shared-64bit branch at:

http://git.kernel.org/?p=fs/ext2/val/e2fsprogs.git;a=summary

> P.S. Here is an interesting side issue:
> 
> Patch 3 mentions that e2image ran to completion after the patch was applied
> (btw, in addition to the 16TiB file, the fs contains a directory with about
> 10^7 zero length files):
> 
> # time e2image -r /dev/mapper/bigvg-bigvol /dev/null
> e2image 1.41.4-shared-64bit (27-Jan-2009)
> 
> real	37m18.991s
> user	15m21.148s
> sys	17m57.151s
> 
> but there is an interesting catch-22: how do I save its output?
> 
> I can try the command line suggested in the manual page:
> 
>   e2image -r <dev> - | bzip2 > image.bz2
> 
> but it takes forever: I started a run on Saturday and it was not
> done by Tuesday when I killed it - writing to the pipe at 4096 bytes
> a pop is very slow.
> 
> Or I can forego the compression and try to save to a file: it's sparse
> (I only used 7GiB before it failed), but its nominal size exceeded the
> maximum file size limit on ext4, at which point I start getting lseek
> failures.

The 16TB limit on ext4 files is an enormous pain for testing 64-bit
(>= 16TB) file systems.  I keep intending to write some simple dm
setup to concatenate two loopback files together, but instead I always
install XFS and create a loopback file on an XFS partition.

-VAL
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux