Re: [PATCH] off-by-one in "Add checks to validate extent entries."

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 07:12:55PM +0200, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
> Theodore Tso wrote:
> > I haven't had time yet to check your other patches; could you also
> > take a quick scan to make sure we have all of the byte-swapping calls
> > needed for proper big-endian checking, that we're using the correct
> > __le32 types and not doing any casts?
>
> I had a look at all patches I have sent, but I didn't notice anything  
> suspicious.  While doing that, however I think I found an off-by-one in
> 56b19868aca856a7d7bf20c3a7a1030e4fd75b2b

In the future, could you please remember to include a Signed-off-by:
for your patches?

Thanks!!

This one is simple enough that I'll just include it, but I'd really
prefer to get explicit signed-off patches.

						- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux