Re: old/new ext3 compatibility

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 2009-03-19_14:45:02-0400 rpeterso:
> > As I understand it, debian lenny's ext3 filesystem uses 256 byte inodes,
> > to be forward compatible with ext4.
> > 
> > I have a production server running debian etch.  It is attached to a
> > fiber channel array, on which it has several ext3 filesystems.  I'm
> > installing a new server, and I'd like to use lenny.  It will be attached
> > to the same array, and I'd like to be able to occasionally use the ext3
> > filesystems created previously.  Ideally, I'd also like to go the other
> > direction as well.  Is this possible, or just crazy talk?
> 
> If I understand what I'm reading correctly, this is a non-problem.  Any
> recent 2.6 kernel should understand ext3 filesystems with 256 byte
> inodes just fine.  The only thing that has happened is that the latest
> debian stable defaults to using 256 byte inodes rather than 128.  Is
> that correct?  Are there any gotcha's here that I should be aware of?
  Yes. Any 2.6 kernel will understand both inode sizes. It is just a
matter of a default in mkfs. Larger inodes allow for more effective
handling of extended attributes, ACLs and such but waste more
space/throughput in case you don't use them...

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SuSE CR Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux