On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 03:17:50PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
>
> I tracked this down to commit 54dc90 in the 2.6.28.8 tree.
>
> I've included it below. Jan and Ted, any ideas on how to fix this
> error?
2.6.29 dropped the CONFIG_OCFS2_COMPAT_JBD option; if you enable it,
causes a compile failure in 2.6.28.8. This should fix it...
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_jbd_compat.h b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_jbd_compat.h
index b91c78f..268949b 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_jbd_compat.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_jbd_compat.h
@@ -60,7 +60,8 @@ static inline int jbd2_journal_file_inode(handle_t *handle,
return 0;
}
-static inline int jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate(struct jbd2_inode *inode,
+static inline int jbd2_journal_begin_ordered_truncate(journal_t *journal,
+ struct jbd2_inode *inode,
loff_t new_size)
{
return 0;
> Should I just revert this from the 2.6.28 tree? Or does no one really
> care about ocfs2 in the stable tree?
I'm not sure how much people will care about CONFIG_OCFS2_COMPAT_JBD,
given that it disappears in 2.6.29, but the above patch should fix
things.
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
