Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 11:32:18AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 05:41:05PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> Theodore Ts'o wrote:
>>>>> Add an ioctl which forces all of the delay allocated blocks to be
>>>>> allocated. This also provides a function ext4_alloc_da_blocks() which
>>>>> will be used by the following commits to force files to be fully
>>>>> allocated to preserve application-expected ext3 behaviour.
>>>>>
>>>> Is it worth checking whether a) the file has delalloc blocks, and/or b)
>>>> whether the mapping is dirty before we spin off a filemap_flush?
>>>>
>>> +int ext4_alloc_da_blocks(struct inode *inode)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_data_blocks &&
>>> + !EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks)
>>> + return 0;
>>>
>>> This check test does (a). Since the ioctl is to force allocation of
>>> delayed allocated blocks i guess (a) is enough because we don't want to
>>> cause a filemap_flush when we don't have any delayed allocated blocks
>>> but have dirty pages around.
>> and b) is as simple as
>>
>> if (!mapping_tagged(inode->i_mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY))
>> return 0;
>
> Yeah, but (b) isn't necessary; if there are some delayed allocation
> blocks, by definition there must be some dirty pages, right?
>
> - Ted
oh, heh. Right you are :)
-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
