On Mar 02, 2009 11:38 +0530, Manish Katiyar wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 11:35 AM, Manish Katiyar <mkatiyar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > While going through jbd code, I was wondering why do we need to check
> > new_transaction for NULL, if we are passing __GFP_NOFAIL ?
> > Last code change around this code was when Ted converted kmalloc to
> > kzalloc, but since he also didn't remove it I am guessing there would
> > be some good reason for it. Can someone enlighten me ?
>
> I didn't receive any response to this. So probably removing the NULL
> check is harmless. Or should I remove the __GFP_NOFAIL flag and keep
> the error handling ?
Neither, please. The NULL check is harmless, and static code checkers
will complain about k[zm]alloc() without a corresponding NULL check.
Branch prediction will get this right, so the overhead is miniscule.
> > start_this_handle() {
> > ..........
> > ..........
> > new_transaction = kzalloc(sizeof(*new_transaction),
> > GFP_NOFS|__GFP_NOFAIL);
> > if (!new_transaction) {
> > ret = -ENOMEM;
> > goto out;
> > }
> > ..........
> > }
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group
Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
