On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 12:53:39PM -0500, Bryan Donlan wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > + if (unlikely(IS_ERR(inode))) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(inode) == -ESTALE) {
> > + ext3_error(dir->i_sb, "ext2_lookup",
> > + "deleted inode referenced: %lu",
> > + ino);
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> > + } else {
> > + return ERR_CAST(inode);
> > + }
> > + }
>
> I just noticed that I forgot to edit the function name in the
> ext3_error and ext4_error invocations... Would it be better to send a
> delta to fix this or resubmit the whole thing?
It's already been pulled into akpm's tree as separate patches. I'll
fix up the ext4 one by hand; probably better for you to send
replacement patches for ext3 separately to akpm and ask him to replace.
I'd suggest using __FUNC__ instead of hard-coding the function name, BTW...
- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
