Dave Kleikamp wrote: > Is there any reason you couldn't have just changed generic_file_llseek() > to do this rather than making identical changes to the individual file > systems. I would think this optimization would be safe for any file > system. Is it safe on 32-bit systems where 64-bit updates are not atomic? You may say that doing multiple parallel lseek() calls is undefined behaviour, so it's ok to end up with file position that none of the individual lseek() calls asked for. But if it's undefined behaviour, no programs should be doing parallel lseek() calls on the same open file, so why optimise it at all? -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
