Re: [PATCH] ext4: fix null pointer deref on mount

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Tso wrote:
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 02:19:55AM +0100, Thiemo Nagel wrote:
I came across a null pointer dereference when mounting an intentionally corrupted filesystem (cf. debug.dmesg). In my opinion, the problem lies in ext4_fill_super(), where truncation may occur on setting the integer db_count, which results in too little memory being allocated for sbi->s_group_desc. The attached patch (against 2.6.28) fixes this by changing the type of db_count to unsigned long. I also took the opportunity to make the check against sign extension in calculation of db_count more strict, so that it now excludes cases in which db_count comes out as zero.

Usigned unsigned long is almost always wrong, because it's not a fixed
size; it's 32 bits on x86_32, but 64 bits on x86_64.  In this
particular case, db_count is always going to well under 32-bits for
any legitimate filesystem.

I have chosen unsigned long for the sole reason to avoid truncation in the assignment

db_count = (sbi->s_groups_count + EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb) - 1) /
	   EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK(sb);

where the operands on the right side are of type unsigned long and ext4_group_t (which is typedef unsigned long), so I don't think to make db_count an unsigned long is hurting anything.

But maybe it's not desireable to allow filesystems which are mountable on x86_64 but not on x86_32? Then a different solution would be to enforce s_groups_count < (1<<31).

But there is another caveat: We also need to take care of the overflow in the argument to kmalloc(), and that further reduces the allowed range of s_groups_count for x86_32 (but not for x86_64):

sbi->s_group_desc = kmalloc(db_count * sizeof(struct buffer_head *),
			    GFP_KERNEL);

So, which approach do you think would be best?

If it isn't we need to have better checks;
it sounds like the checks we need are ones that do a better job
checking s_blocks_per_group; am I right in assuming that
s_blocks_per_group was something ridiculous and that is what caused
the overflow?

No, it was a very large block count (but the small blocks per group helped, too):

block count 562949953423360, first data block 8257, blocks per group 512

BTW:  In case anybody likes to have a look at the corrupt filesystem:
It's available at http://www.e18.physik.tu-muenchen.de/~tnagel/misc/ext4.null_deref.image.bz2
The size of the download is 88k.

Kind regards,
Thiemo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux