On Wednesday 03 December 2008 18:23:09 Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:04:41PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > Can you make sure you have the below patch in the kernel. > > c001077f4003fa75793bb62979baa6241dd8eb19 Yes, I do have that patch in kernel (verified through git and looking at the source). Its a part of linus' tree. > Mmmm, good point, thanks. I had been assuming this was caused by some > failure in the delayed allocation code with block accounting, but we > also had a bug fix that was causing a problem with inode allocation. > > That doesn't explain a report of an ENOSPC error with metadata only > changes were failing (i.e., touching a file that already exists), > although I don't think we've gotten a lot of information about that > scenario and it feels a little unconfirmed to me still... Unfortunately I am not absolutely sure (I reported this) as well, this is the reason I did not report it at first but only after no culprit could be found. Still no luck reproducing it once more. Andres
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
