Bill Davidsen wrote:
I seriously disagree on that, writing it as a for makes it totally
clear that the index initialization is part of the loop.
I know, looks funny, not the way we have always done it, not invented
here...
Just to be clear, I didn't mean that in any bad way, just that sometimes
a new format, even if correct and unambiguous, looks strange to the eye
and is not used just because it jars. I still think putting
initialization for a loop in the start of the for is defensive
programming, perhaps I've had too many bumblers inherit my code.
--
Bill Davidsen <davidsen@xxxxxxx>
"Woe unto the statesman who makes war without a reason that will still
be valid when the war is over..." Otto von Bismark
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
