On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 02:47:36PM -0800, Mingming Cao wrote:
>
> 在 2008-12-02二的 11:39 +0530，Aneesh Kumar K.V写道：
> > The mballoc code likes to call ext4_error while it is holding locked
> > block groups. This can causes a scheduling in atomic context BUG. We
> > can't just unlock the block group and relock it after/if ext4_error
> > returns since that might result in race conditions in the case where
> > the filesystem is set to continue after finding errors.
> >
> > -V5 changes:
> > update ext4_commit_super to use the percpu free blocks and free inodes
> > counter values.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > fs/ext4/ext4.h | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> > fs/ext4/mballoc.h | 47 -----------------------------------------------
> > fs/ext4/super.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 4 files changed, 105 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)
>
>
>
> > void ext4_update_dynamic_rev(struct super_block *sb)
> > {
> > struct ext4_super_block *es = EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es;
> > @@ -2820,8 +2858,11 @@ static void ext4_commit_super(struct super_block *sb,
> > set_buffer_uptodate(sbh);
> > }
> > es->s_wtime = cpu_to_le32(get_seconds());
> > - ext4_free_blocks_count_set(es, ext4_count_free_blocks(sb));
> > - es->s_free_inodes_count = cpu_to_le32(ext4_count_free_inodes(sb));
> > + ext4_free_blocks_count_set(es, percpu_counter_sum_positive(
> > + &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeblocks_counter));
> > + es->s_free_inodes_count = cpu_to_le32(percpu_counter_sum_positive(
> > + &EXT4_SB(sb)->s_freeinodes_counter));
> > +
> > BUFFER_TRACE(sbh, "marking dirty");
> > mark_buffer_dirty(sbh);
> > if (sync) {
>
> I thought the per cpu s_freeblocks_counter is not as accurate as the sum
> of group free blocks counters, we are depending on
> ext4_count_free_blocks() to gets the accurate free blocks counter
> flushed to disk...
>
The super block values are not used in the kernel. A wrong value of
free_blocks/free_inode count in super block will be fixed by a
subsequent e2fsck. I guess we can afford to have less accurate value
of free_blocks/free_inodes in super block.
-aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
