On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:53:21AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 03:12:27PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote: > > When iterating through the pages with all mapped buffer_heads > > we failed to update the b_state value. This result in allocating > > blocks at logical offset 0. > > > > Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Hey Aneesh, > > I've been going through patches in the patch queue and I noticed that > the subsequent patch > > [PATCH 2/2] ext4: Mark the buffer_heads as dirty and uptodate after prepare_write > > has been merged to mainline, but this one wasn't. From looking at the > e-mail record, you said that the second one fixed the rtorrent > corruption --- but looking at this patch and its description, it looks > like this one should perhaps get pushed to Linus ASAP as well. Do you > remember if both patches were needed to fix the rtorrent corruption > problem, or only the second one? Both patches are not needed to fix the rtorrent problem. The second patch actually fix the rtorrent issue. -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
