On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:56:43AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 08:24:10PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> > index 4932b34..6694561 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/jbd2.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> > @@ -329,6 +329,7 @@ enum jbd_state_bits {
> > BH_State, /* Pins most journal_head state */
> > BH_JournalHead, /* Pins bh->b_private and jh->b_bh */
> > BH_Unshadow, /* Dummy bit, for BJ_Shadow wakeup filtering */
> > + BH_JBD_State_bits_End,
> > };
> >
> > BUFFER_FNS(JBD, jbd)
>
> Note: this conflicts with a patch by Mark Fasheh which does something
> very similar, since OCFS2 also needs some private BH flags. He used
> the name BH_JBDPrivateStart, though.
>
> Originally the plan was going to be that Mark was going to send this
> to Linus, but given that we need it as well, I suggest that we drop it
> into both the OCFS2 and ext4 trees, and whichever one hits Linus's
> tree first will win, and in the other case the magic of git's merge
> algorithms should make the right thing happen in the second. (Or the
> other team can drop the patch before they merge; either will do the
> right thing.)
Yeah, that's fine with me. We'll both carry it for now and the merge window
will just get sorted out :)
--Mark
--
Mark Fasheh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
