This fixes a 2.6.27 regression which was introduced in commit a02908f1. We weren't passing the chunk parameter down to the two subections, ext4_indirect_trans_blocks() and ext4_ext_index_trans_blocks(), with the result that massively overestimate the amount of credits needed by ext4_da_writepages, especially in the non-extents case. This causes failures especially on /boot partitions, which tend to be small and non-extent using since GRUB doesn't handle extents. This patch fixes the bug reported by Joseph Fannin at: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11964 Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> (cherry picked from commit ac51d83705c2a38c71f39cde99708b14e6212a60) --- fs/ext4/inode.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c index 7e91913..4ec89d3 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c @@ -4444,9 +4444,10 @@ static int ext4_indirect_trans_blocks(struct inode *inode, int nrblocks, static int ext4_index_trans_blocks(struct inode *inode, int nrblocks, int chunk) { if (!(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL)) - return ext4_indirect_trans_blocks(inode, nrblocks, 0); - return ext4_ext_index_trans_blocks(inode, nrblocks, 0); + return ext4_indirect_trans_blocks(inode, nrblocks, chunk); + return ext4_ext_index_trans_blocks(inode, nrblocks, chunk); } + /* * Account for index blocks, block groups bitmaps and block group * descriptor blocks if modify datablocks and index blocks -- 1.6.0.4.8.g36f27.dirty -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
