Re: [RFC PATCH -V3 1/9] ext4: sparse fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 12:19:26AM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>  #define EXT4_HAS_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,mask)			\
> -	(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_feature_compat & cpu_to_le32(mask))
> +	(le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_feature_compat) & mask)
>  #define EXT4_HAS_RO_COMPAT_FEATURE(sb,mask)			\
> -	(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_feature_ro_compat & cpu_to_le32(mask))
> +	(le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_feature_ro_compat) & mask)
>  #define EXT4_HAS_INCOMPAT_FEATURE(sb,mask)			\
> -	(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_feature_incompat & cpu_to_le32(mask))
> +	(le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_feature_incompat) & mask)

This is going to force a byte-swap instruction on every single
big-endian system out there, which could potentially be costly, or at
least undeed given that all of the times that these functions are
called, the result gets used only as a booelan.

Can we shut up sparse by using a explicit cast to an unsigned int?

       	       	      	       	 	  - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux