On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 12:40 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 08:43:03AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > It works for me. I really need to get off my butt and get -mm into > > linux-next. > > > > I can merge ext4-quota-handling-for-delayed-allocation.patch if you > > like, or you can merge it once te quota changes have gone in. > > > > If you are willing to carry the > ext4-quota-handling-for-delayed-allocation.patch, that would be great. > I saw Andrew already picked up the ext4 quota changes. I will address Andrew's comments soon. I assume I will working on incremental fixes to address the comments? Or should I send new version of the series? > Mingming, what I'll do is create a branch of the ext4 patch queue > (since it's being maintained in git anyway), that basically reflects > the patch queue as it currently exists today. You can do your > development in that branch so it won't impact you terribly, but I'll > then set master branch of the ext4 patch queue to be a version that > drops all of the quota related changes. Sure, that works for me. > But keeping this stuff all in -mm should work, although depending on > how many more cleanup patches flow into ext4, this might cause some > minor patch conflicts on that last quota dellaloc patch that actually > touches ext4 core code. > Since Andrew already picked up the ext4 quota changes, I will work against mm tree then. Mingming -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
