Re: data corruption with ext4 (from 2.6.27.4) exposed by rtorrent

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Theodore Tso <tytso@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 12:42:11PM +0000, Roc Valles wrote:
>> Some person already reported this. I'm having the same problem.
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=122557056518246&w=2
>>
>> rtorrent is a bittorrent client that makes heavy use of mmap instead
>> of read/write to avoid needless duplication of data. It has exposed
>> other bugs in the past (mmap bug in 2.6.19).
>> http://libtorrent.rakshasa.no
>> Downloading a big torrent (>2GB) with rtorrent triggers it more times
>> than not. The bigger the torrent, the higher the likeliness of
>> failure. When the torrent is finished, if a hash check is forced by
>> pressing control-r on the torrent, some blocks will fail.
>
> Can both of you send the output of "dumpe2fs -h /dev/<disk device>" of
> the filesystem in question?  The thing which I'm most interested in is
> whether the extents feature was enabled or not.  (i.e., was this a
> freshly made ext4 filesystem, or a ext3 filesystem mounted under ext4,
> and with which features eanbled?)
>

I tested this further and it turned out that this bug is not extents
related. I get the same hash failures on a partition formatted with:
-O "^extent".

Besides the torrent failures,  ext4 also managed to corrupt two
dspam sqlite3 databases on my system. (After the corruption I
get the following error:
*** glibc detected *** dspam: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000000001e71c58 ***
======= Backtrace: =========
/lib/libc.so.6[0x7fcd1f941af6]
/lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0xbd)[0x7fcd1f942f3d]
/usr/lib64/dspam/libsqlite3_drv.so(_ds_setall_spamrecords+0x395)[0x7fcd1ea03075]
/usr/lib/libdspam.so.7(_ds_operate+0x400)[0x7fcd1fc3c710]
/usr/lib/libdspam.so.7(dspam_process+0x1d9)[0x7fcd1fc3cf49]
dspam(process_message+0xb49)[0x408579]
dspam(process_users+0x57d)[0x40902d]
dspam(main+0x2c2)[0x409832]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfd)[0x7fcd1f8e848d]
dspam[0x402f79
and the only solution is to restore the database from ext3 backup)

My conclusion is that ext4 is not yet ready for prime time.
I moved all my data back to ext3.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux