Re: jbd/jbd2 performance improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ric Wheeler writes:
 > Do you have any details on the test case that you ran that showed a 
 > clear improvement? What kind of storage & IO pattern did you use?

Is it possible to record latencytop output (like top batch mode) to
capture the highest latency during a test run?

Or how did you collect this:
>my reproducer is sadly very simple (claws-mail is my mail client that uses maildir)
>Process claws-mail (4896)                  Total: 2829.7 msec
>EXT3: Waiting for journal access                  2491.0 msec         88.4 %
>Writing back inodes                                160.9 msec          5.7 %
>synchronous write                                   78.8 msec          3.0 %
>is an example of such a trace (this is with patch, without patch the numbers are about 3x bigger)
>Waiting for journal access is "journal_get_write_access"
>Writing back inodes is "writeback_inodes"
>synchronous write is "do_sync_write"


-- 
solofo


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux