Peter Zijlstra wrote:
....
> +static inline int atomic64_dec_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + write_seqlock(&v->slock);
> + v->counter--;
> + ret = !v->counter;
> + write_sequnlock(&v->slock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int atomic64_add_and_test(atomic64_t *v)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + write_seqlock(&v->slock);
> + v->counter++;
> + ret = !v->counter;
> + write_sequnlock(&v->slock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
would it be more logical to call this atomic64_inc_and_test to match the
above dec_and_test ?
regards
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
