Hi,
Just a quick question (not a criticism of the patches in any way):
Is there a specific reason that the flag FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_ENCRYPTED
exists? I am only asking because there isn't a
FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_COMPRESSED flag yet the effect on the data is the
same. I suppose one could argue that compression is a form of
encryption (as one cannot read the data on disk without decompressing
it) and thus for compressed files I can just set
FIEMAP_EXTENT_DATA_ENCRYPTED, too?
Best regards,
Anton
--
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer, http://www.linux-ntfs.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
