Theodore Tso wrote: > On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 05:01:10PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> It seems like adjusting the following test is a better plan; >> for starters I do not see that best_flex can ever be < 0, so > > Given that ext4_group_t is an unsigned long, that's certainly true. > :-) Heh, that too! >> that test is replaced, and if the current "best" flex group >> has no inodes free, and the current one does have room, >> it is promoted to the next "best." > > Looks good to me. I've added it to the patch queue. > >> Signed-of-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > (forgot an 'f' :-) Urk... Thanks! -Eric > Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@xxxxxxx> > > - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
