Re: tracepoints in ext4 (and/or ext3?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 08:19:54AM -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote:
> 
> Good idea, although Im not sure if ext[34] is the best place we should
> start putting markers though.

I can think of ext3/4 specific markers that would be useful for people
who are tuning our filesystems for performance.  This would include
when we start and end tranactions, when we force a checkpoint, when we
create and, extend, and finish using a handle in the jbd layer.

In the ext4 itself, knowing when we are mapping delayed allocations
would be useful, as well as when we freeze and unfreeze a filesystem
(i.e., for snapshots).

There are a lot of other tracepoints that probably do make more sense
to be put in the VFS layer, although on thing that would be *really*
nice is some semantic sugar in Systemtap or in a Systemtap tapset so
that we only trigger the tracepoints for a particular filesystem.

     	     	     	 	     	   - Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Reiser Filesystem Development]     [Ceph FS]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux FS]     [Yosemite National Park]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux