On Thu, 31 Jul 2008, Szabolcs Szakacsits wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008, Theodore Tso wrote:
>
> > What happens if you try benchmarking unpacking a kernel source tar.bz2
> > file? My guess is that ntfs-3g won't look as good. :-)
>
> It seems the tar.bz2 number is not so bad relatively but the metadata
> performance difference is much more visible by eliminating the compression
> overhead. The results are in second.
>
> ext3 ntfs-3g
> tar.bz2 7.7 12.4
> tar.gz 3.1 8.7
> tar 1.4 7.6
Sorry, I didn't use the currently best performing ntfs-3g version.
Corrected results:
ext3 ntfs-3g
---- -------
tar.bz2 7.7 9.9
tar.gz 3.1 6.0
tar 1.4 4.9
Compilation of e2fsprogs:
ext3 ntfs-3g
---- -------
unpack 0.27 0.47
configure 8.42 9.73
make 21.35 23.33
make -j 13.21 14.09
make clean 0.20 0.24
Please not that ntfs-3g and fuse is not yet optimized for metadata
operations.
Szaka
--
NTFS-3G: http://ntfs-3g.org
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
