On Jul 23, 2008 08:30 -0500, Jose R. Santos wrote: > On Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:58:50 -0600 > Andreas Dilger <adilger@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jose, do you have ext3 results on the same system > > for the benchmarks you ran? That would tell us how much improvement we > > get from other ext4 features (e.g. extents vs. block allocation) and how > > much from flex_bg. > > No I dont, I tried doing some runs yesterday but after updating the > kernel, the results flex_bg are about the same as without it and ext3 > is a lot faster than ext4. Im investigating to see if I messed up the > kernel build somehow or if we have a regression. There was another report that the current ext4 code is no longer faster at compilebench than ext3. > Valerie did a very comprehensive set of comparisons that could be > useful for the presentation. I'll try to see if I can recreate this > once I figure out the regression im seeing but would this work for now? > > http://www.bullopensource.org/ext4/20080530/ffsb-readwrite-2.6.26-rc2.html Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
