On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:54:36AM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > > 在 2008-07-14一的 22:23 +0530,Aneesh Kumar K.V写道: > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 09:28:17AM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > > > > > > Ext4: Fix delalloc enospace handling counter update race > > > > > > From: Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Also in the case of truncate, we should not clear the per-allocation allocated > > > metablocks counter as that may be in-use by parallel allocation. The patch > > > only clear the per-allocation allocated metablocks when allocation is successfully returned. > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mingming Cao <cmm@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > @@ -1519,7 +1529,8 @@ void ext4_da_release_space(struct inode > > > > > > BUG_ON(mdb > EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks); > > > EXT4_I(inode)->i_reserved_meta_blocks = mdb; > > > - EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks = 0; > > > + if (used) > > > + EXT4_I(inode)->i_allocated_meta_blocks = 0; > > > spin_unlock(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_block_reservation_lock); > > > } > > > > > After think again, this part of race fix may not needed, when the first > part of patch is applied. Since truncate is also hold the i_data_sem, so > it could be assured that when truncate is releasing the page's reserved > blocks, there is no parallel block allocation. But truncate calls invalidate_page without holding i_data_sem. vmtruncate -> truncate_inode_pages -> invalidate_page. -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html