On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 03:42:00PM +0100, Duane Griffin wrote: > + if (bh2jh(this_bh)) > + ext4_journal_dirty_metadata(handle, this_bh); > + else > + ext4_error(inode->i_sb, __func__, > + "circular indirect block detected, " > + "inode=%lu, block=%lu", > + inode->i_ino, this_bh->b_blocknr); this_bh->b_blocknr is a sector_t, which could be 64-bits. So this should be: ext4_error(inode->i_sb, __func__, "circular indirect block detected, " "inode=%lu, block=%llu", inode->i_ino, (unsigned long long) this_bh->b_blocknr); I think. With this change, I've included your three patches into the ext4 patch queue. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
