Thanks for your feedback ! Le jeudi 26 juin 2008 à 17:26 -0600, Andreas Dilger a écrit : > On Jun 26, 2008 16:58 +0200, Fr�d�ric Boh� wrote: > > From: Frederic Bohe <frederic.bohe@xxxxxxxx> > > + num_meta_group_infos_max = num_meta_group_infos + > > + le16_to_cpu(es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks); > > The only drawback of NOT handling this properly is that once (eventually) > we allow resizing with META_BG this code will be broken again. It at > least deserves a comment like "Need to handle this properly when META_BG > resizing is allowed" so that it will show up on any grep for META_BG. > > It probably also makes sense to round this up to the next power-of-two > value, since kmalloc will do that internally anyways, and it gives us > some resizing headroom for no cost. Do you have any idea of how this headroom could be used in the future ? Regards, Fred -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
